Overview of DHC Legislative Framework
|
Overview of DHC Legislative Framework |
|
|
Denmark |
|
Download pdf version
|
Legislative Framework |
|
The legislative framework of district heating is and has been defined by the general energy policy, which earlier was very much influenced by the economic situation in Denmark and the economic policies, but in later years mainly by the environmental concerns arising from energy consumption. Background The first response, outlined in a government report from 1976 and later reinforced in an Energy Plan from 1981, consisted of measures to reduce energy consumption, a push from oil to coal as fuel in the thermal electricity production and a heating policy aiming at utilising the huge amount of surplus heat available from electricity production. Furthermore, initiatives were taken to develop national resources of oil and gas in the North Sea and the construction and expansion of transmission and distribution networks for district heating and natural gas, followed by intervention in the heat market to ensure sale of both. As a more secure supply of energy has been achieved and as the environmental effects of energy consumption have become apparent, political emphasis has shifted accordingly. A variety of instruments has been used throughout the period. One of the most important was the heat supply act of 1979. Heat market intervention The heat supply act was based on a number of recommendations from various committees and organisations, most importantly the National Energy Plan from 1976, and was a great extent a law on heat planning. It came into force in 1979. It was amended several times and completely updated/replaced) by a new act from 1990, which however kept many of the elements of the original act, but in a simpler form. A copy of an unofficial translation from year 2000 into English is provided as attachment. Please note that the translation is not particularly precise, and that changes to the law since year 2000 are not included. It is by far the most important legislative measure regarding district heating. Its objective is “§1 (..) to promote the most socio-economic and environmentally friendly utilization of energy for heating buildings, supplying them with hot water and reduce the dependency of the energy system on oil.” And this shall be organized “…with a view to promoting the highest possible degree of cogeneration of heat and power.” The act regulates: “§2 (..) collective heat-supply plant means any undertaking that operates the below-mentioned plants with the object of supplying energy for heating buildings and supplying them with hot water: 1) plants producing and transmitting other inflammable gasses than natural gas; 2) plants for transmitting heated water or steam from combined heat and power plants, waste incineration plants, industrial enterprises, geothermal installations, etc.; 3) district heating supply plants, solar heating plants, waste-incineration plants, etc. , including combined heat and power plants with an electric effect not greater than 25 MW; 4) block heating stations with heat generating capacity exceeding 0.25 MW, including combined heat and power plants with an electricity output not greater than 25 MW.”
Collective heat supply systems are regulated on areas such as: · General purpose (as described above) · Heat planning (also natural gas) · Expropriations (also natural gas) · Prices · Regulatory oversight (prices) · Mergers and separations of assets, consumers influence · Technical oversight · Consumer complaints (consumer protection) · Public service Obligations · Penalty clauses etc. The Heat supply act defines district heating and natural gas for individual/domestic use as “collective heat supply”. Electricity theoretically could have been included, but was banned as source of heat in areas defined as suitable for collective heat supply, since electricity mainly was a product of inefficient thermal production. The heat supply act has been supported by a range of measures and has itself supported a number of other policies. Taxation Subsidies Subsidies for the development of the district sector has mainly been to support development of network, increase the number of connected buildings in district heating areas or to facilitate the introduction of new heat production technologies or fuels in district heating. Waste regulation General framework The principle was introduced in the operation of municipal utilities in the 1950’ties, when the ministry of interior affairs stated, that is was to rule the relation between a municipally owned and run utility and other municipal activities such as schools etc. It prevents municipalities from transferring funds from utilities to other activities and/or to use tax revenue to support utilities. This is contrary to the “stadtwerke” model seen elsewhere, where profit from utilities can play an important role in financing the general activities of municipalities. Cooperatives Introducing the not-for-profit principle, with the heat supply act, to govern the running of district heating utilities, was therefore relatively uncontroversial. It already governed municipal utilities and the electricity sector, and turned out to be a viable solution to the problems associated with the natural monopoly inherent in district heating networks, and the dominant position of district heating in the heat market created by the heat planning system. It is unlikely that the heat planning had been accepted, if the monopoly and dominance it created, had been in the hands of a commercial company. |
Purpose of the Legislation |
|
Target groups The act was part of a policy aiming at developing an energy sector with multiple sources and fuels, to counter the problems encountered with the oil-only supply until the energy crisis. It was to shift the heating sector away from individual oil and electrical heating, and to provide security for the heavy investments needed in expansion of district heating and the new natural gas networks. Natural gas was being introduced in the 80’ties, with the first gas from the Danish North Sea sector coming ashore in 1984. Results |
